Índice
Twin towers: terrorist attack or auto-attack?
Grupo Elron

There is a spanish version




The old trick of replacing an airplane with a missile.




Who stole the airplane that was going to crash into the Pentagon? http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/pentagon_sp.htm#Main

http://youtube.com/watch?v=4kGi0wK2ceo



The key is in Bellatrix.

The military forces know with certainty it wasn’t an airplane the cause of the destruction in the Pentagon. They suspect it was an alien attack. However they prefer to keep the crazy posture it was an airplane and civilians to believe they hide something, rather than making a fool of themselves in public by telling the truth.



Despite what authors want to make us believe about their thesis of an auto-attack, the destruction of the Twin Towers was exclusively caused by the explosion of the fuel of the planes that impacted on them. The explosion of the fuel caused a tremendous heating wave which practically melted the steel of the buildings causing their collapse in few minutes. The rest of the speculations, explosives in the walls, inside job, and others, are pure fantasies. Obviously, reality doesn't sell books, but conspiracy does.



The story is always the same: when nobody knows the truth, someone makes it up. If it is morbid and infamous, it will be better. The Twins Towers attack was the result of the negligence of those who were responsible to defend the country, because they ignored the warnings about the terrorists planning an attack against an important target, but not a military one, in the heart of New York. But as we know: “It's good fishing in troubled waters”.


It is possible to criticize any government of the United States about their good or bad work to rule the Nation, but never to reproach them about sabotaging their own country in order to get an excuse for an invasion. By other way, it is another issue that Bush government has taken advantage of a tragedy to justify it.



Also, Roosevelt was falsely accused of allowing a Japanese battle victory in Pearl Harbor as a strategy developed by himself since 1939 to get USA into World War II, which helped USA to become the most powerful nation of the world.



Osama Bin Laden is the visible face of the terrorism. He planned completely by himself the Twin Towers attack, without any involvement of the United States. Although the operation was planned meticulously by months and the two pilots who hijacked the planes were very expert - they were not amateurs- like those who want us to believe the theory of an inside job. The final result surpassed the best expectations of the terrorists since they were expecting to destroy just a couple of floors.


The UFO filmed next to the Twin Towers came from Bellatrix IV, but it was not the only one there. For more information: "Ovnis en las Torres Gemelas".


“North America’s freedom will lose its light. Its torch won’t light anymore and the monument will be attack to times”.


This supposed prophecy given by Benjamín Solari Parravicini has been considered for some feverish people as the future vision of the Twin Towers attack. In fact, if he had said “three times”, people would add the Pentagon attack. Moreover, if he had said “one time”, people would say the attack happened just in one day. The prophetical drawings are similar to the Rorschach Inblot Test, where everybody sees what he/she wants to see.

 

 

Este reportaje demuestra cabalmente de que cuando no se sabe la verdad el vacío se llena con cualquier cosa, especialmente truculenta si se trata de vender libros.

Enlace a la página (comentariosdelibros.com)

Bruno Cardeñosa - Entrevista


Sr. Cardeñosa. Usted acaba de publicar un libro titulado "11-S: Historia De Una Infamia" que pone, cuanto menos, en tela de juicio la versión oficial que se dio en relación con los atentados del 11-S. ¿Cuáles son los datos más destacables en los se ha basado para elaborarlo?

Son infinidad. La investigación partió del estudio pausado y crítico del atentado que ocurrió en el Pentágono. Al averiguar y descubrir que sobre este hecho se nos ocultaban muchas informaciones, no dudé en seguir estudiando el tema. Después recogí cientos de pequeñas pistas y piezas que todas juntas dieron forma al libro. Son muy sorprendentes los datos que hablan sobre cómo en las altas esferas del poder estaban al tanto de cuándo, cómo y dónde iban a suceder los atentados. Ahí he bebido de diferentes fuentes informativas, entrevistas, documentos oficiales, etc. También se han efectuado para el libro simulaciones de vuelo que han servido para aclarar muchos extraños sobre quiénes eran los pilotos, amén de mucha investigación científica; se han recogido muchos datos en ese sentido, informaciones sobre la explosiones, los aviones, los restos, los impactos, la identificación de víctimas. Es muy difícil destacar alguna de las informaciones por encima de las otras.

¿Qué posibilidad, en función de probabilidad, existe de que la teoría de los atentados tal y cómo se mostró al mundo por parte de las autoridades norteamericanas fuese lo que realmente pasó? 

La probabilidad es del cien por cien, sin el más mínimo género de dudas. Se nos mintió de forma flagrante respecto a cómo sucedieron los hechos aquel 11-S. Toda la versión oficial está plagada de mentiras, como demuestro en el libro. Que nos hayan engañado de esa forma, se debe, sin duda, a alguna razón de peso... Y esa no es otra más que ocultar la implicación directa o indirecta en los hechos del propio poder norteamericano, que fue el que salió más beneficiado de los atentados.

Sr. Cardeñosa, ¿cree usted en las conspiraciones a gran escala?

La verdad es que nunca me había sentido identificado ni con el término conspiraciones ni con quienes defendían esta otra forma de interpretar la realidad. Dentro del ámbito de las llamadas conspiraciones hay infinidad de teorías totalmente descerebradas y carentes de respaldo documental. Sin embargo, con los sucesos del 11-S sucede lo contrario: sobre las versiones alternativas hay gran cantidad de evidencias realmente muy contrastables. El haber efectuado directamente una investigación de los hechos me ha conducido a esa hipótesis.

¿Cree usted que el ataque contra el World Trade Center aquel 11-S, y el que sufrió el Pentágono, fueron fruto de una conspiración?

Sin lugar a dudas. Se unieron una serie de factores que confluyeron en los atentados. Y detrás de la ejecución de los mismos hubo una implicación de las autoridades realmente inconfesable. Dicen en criminología que identificado a quien sale beneficiado de un crimen, se identifica al culpable. Aquí está claro: quienes han sacado y obtenido un provecho extraordinario de los acontecimientos fueron sin duda miembros de un sector del poder político, militar y económico de los EE.UU.

Si así fuese... ¿quién cree que estaría detrás de tal acto de barbarie?

Dice un politólogo de talla internacional como es Jaime Petras, que hay tres posibilidades: un acto terrorista autónomo, un autoatentado o una acción terrorista aletada y apoyada desde las cloacas del poder. Él descarta la primera hipótesis. Yo también. Y es que con esta investigación no he podido llegar a averiguar todo, absolutamente todo lo ocurrido, pero sí he llegado a la conclusión tras mucho trabajo de qué no ocurrió. Y lo que nos dijeron que sucedió no es verdad. Algo más hay, y ese algo más es verdadera siniestro y apunta al poder.

En su libro "11-S: Historia De Una Infamia" hay datos sumamente reveladores que llaman poderosamente la atención. Uno de ellos, y al menos a mi me parece que es uno de los que más impacto pueden causar, es el hecho de que usted duda de que el choque de ambos aviones en la zona media de ambas torres fuese la causa del desplome. ¿Por qué duda de ello?

Por diferentes razones. La primera de ellas es testimonial y se basa en declaraciones de quienes fueron protagonistas directos de los acontecimientos, personas que estaban dentro de las torres en el entorno y que identificaron varias explosiones antes de los atentados. La segunda se fundamenta en un hecho científico: el queroseno de los aviones no puede desplegar temperaturas superiores cuando se incendia a los 800 grados centígrados, mientras que el acero de las torres gemelas requiere de temperaturas por encima de los 1.400 grados para que se funda y ceda. 

Esto quiere decir que además del impacto de los aviones tuvo que suceder algo más... ¿Explosivos? Muy posiblemente, puesto que la tercera pista conduce a los institutos sismográficos que registraron explosiones justo antes de la caída de cada una de las torres.

Otro dato interesante que apunta en su libro es que en el Pentágono no se estrelló ningún avión, sino que fue un proyectil, un misil el que ocasionó cuantiosos daños tanto en la estructura del edificio como en la pérdida atroz de vidas humanas. ¿De veras lo cree?

Con una seguridad total. Durante año y medio de investigaciones no se ha obtenido una sola pista, ni una sola, que sirva para sostener el impacto de un avión contra el Pentágono. en el libro ofrezco infinidad de pruebas en ese sentido. Ni hay restos, ni pruebas físicas, ni evidencias gráficas de ningún tipo, ni testigos... No hay nada de nada. Podemos tener fe y creer en la versión oficial sobre la caída del avión, pero la lógica, la investigación, los testimonios, las pruebas, las fotografías, la ausencia de restos, las incoherencias y mentiras oficiales al respecto, las simulaciones de vuelo efectuadas para el libro, etc. nos indican que sin ningún género de dudas allí no cayó un avión.

Si en el Pentágono no se estrelló ningún avión, ¿qué ocurrió entonces con ese avión desaparecido, y con el pasaje?

El avión muy probablemente dejó de existir cuando se perdió el rastro del mismo en el radar, justo en la frontera con Ohio, sobre una amplísima zona deshabitada. Allí, el avión o fue derribado o explosionó por alguna razón. Si el avión se hubiera dirigido hasta Washington, habría aparecido en las pantallas de radar y eso no ocurrió.

Usted apunta en su obra algo sumamente interesante que merece ser considerado seriamente. El hecho de que resulta sumamente extraño que, por ejemplo, apenas unas horas después de los acontecimientos se supiese, con total seguridad, los datos de todos los integrantes de los comandos terroristas y su responsable ideológico. ¿Cómo cree que se tuvo tal precisión para saberlo apenas unas horas después de los acontecimientos?

Ese es un elemento para la sospecha en la que entonces nada cayó, pero con el tiempo se averiguó que, por ejemplo, se conocían por parte de los servicios secretos y por parte de diferentes cuerpos y fuerzas de seguridad del Estado los nombres de algunos de los terroristas. Incluso en esos documentos se les cita como sospechosos de estar preparando algún tipo de atentado. La razón es que muy probablemente se sabía todo antes, y se conocía cómo iba a gestionarse la versión oficial.

¿Cree usted que lo ocurrido fue debido a que hubo una total descoordinación entre las fuerzas de seguridad estadounidenses, o que hay algo más detrás?

No, descoordinación no hubo, aunque el gobierno americano ha sido muy ágil a la hora de hacernos creer que detrás de todo aquello hubo una monstruosa negligencia de los servicios secretos. Pero a tenor de las pistas que se han conocido y de muchas de las informaciones que he manejado, no hay otra posibilidad que pensar que más que negligencia hubo omisión deliberada de acción por parte de las fuerzas de seguridad.

¿Se pudieron haber evitado los atentados del 11-S?

Pudieron haberse evitado, pero no interesó en ningún momento. Y es que los atentados del 11-S han sido la excusa perfecta, la justificación idónea, que ese sector siniestro del poder necesitaba para poner en marcha una serie de planes establecidos con anterioridad a nivel militar, político y económico.

Supongamos que la versión que tenemos de los atentados del 11-S no fue la verdad, y que lo que usted apunta en su libro tiene más verosimilitud. ¿Por qué se cometió semejante barbarie? ¿Alguien sacaría beneficio con ello? Y si así fuese, ¿quién?

La lista de personas, instituciones y empresas beneficiados del 11-S es más larga y extensa que la lista de víctimas directas de los atentados. 

Ese pudo ser el objetivo de la barbarie: obtener unos dividendos tan amplios como espantosos. Empresas armamentísticas y petrolíferas por un lado, sociedades de capital de riesgo por otro, constructoras y empresas de servicios dispuestas a entrar en nuevos mercados públicos como el de Irak, que se ha convertido en la mayor oportunidad financiara a muchos niveles desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial, etc. Lo grave es que cuando investigas quienes están detrás de esos beneficios, descubres que son los mismos que dirigen los hilos de la política norteamericana, bien desde el poder electo, bien desde la sombra. Basta con mirar las cuentas de algunas de esas empresas.

¿Ejemplos? Muchos. Veamos: Halliburton es una empresa de la que fue máximo mandamás el actual vicepresidente de EEUU. A esta empresa se le han entregado contratas multimillonarias para la reconstrucción de Irak, para el desarrollo de infraestructuras petrolíferas en Asia Central y Oriente Medio, o para la ampliación física de la base de Guantánamo, en donde se hacinan los presos capturados por EEUU. ¿Más casos? Lockhed Martin, empresa armamentística que desde el 11-S y casi diariamente reciben contratos por millones de dólares que le entrega el Gobierno para desarrollar nuevas armas o para entregar al Ejército nuevos sistemas. 

Luego descubres que esta empresa financió parte de la campaña electoral de Bush y que ha sido la impulsora de la oposición política al régimen de Saddam. 

Así, tantas y tantas empresas que da horror pensar lo bien que les vino el 11-S. Todo es más grave cuando descubres que el poder norteamericano pareció facilitar cuando o impulsar aquellos actos.

Si todo fuese tal y como usted cree y refleja en su libro, hay algo que no entiendo bien, y qué pinta en todo esto la figura del terrorista saudita Osamma Bin Laden.

La de gran aliado. Bin Laden y Bush, sus familias especialmente, son aliados desde hace décadas. Tienen negocios en común que se mantuvieron incluso después del 11-S. No sé si ese papel lo ha jugado de forma consciente o no Bin Laden, pero lo que sí sabemos es que toda su parafernalia americana no es más que retórica y que sus llamadas a la guerra santa y a atentar contra EEUU no han sido seguidas por nadie.

Se ha sobredimensionado la capacidad de Al Qaeda y la del propio Bin Laden, quien fue en enlace de la CIA en Afganistán durante los años ochenta.

Por cierto, ¿cómo es que aún no se ha podido detener a este terrorista?

Se sabe que está perfectamente controlado. Se sabe dónde está. No resulta creíble la historia que nos venden de él. No es creíble que Bin Laden pueda ser entrevistado por periodistas que pueden localizarlo y los agentes secretos de la CIA y otros servicios secretos radicados en Afganistán no hayan sido capaces de hacerlo. Pero es que interesa mantener a la amenaza con vida, interesa que siga estando ahí para que utilizando el temor que genera en la sociedad pueda continuar tomándose decisiones. 
Si todo lo que se ha hecho después del 11-S tenía por objeto capturar a Bin Laden y no se ha hecho es porque su existencia permite continuar con esa guerra contra el terrorismo que permitirá adentrarse en nuevos países y abrir nuevos horizontes a los verdaderos beneficiados. Con Bin Laden entre rejas, se les acabó el negocio.

Y ya para terminar, aunque quedarían muchísimas preguntas en el tintero, ¿no cree usted que pese a los datos que usted aporta en el libro, a veces las cosas no son tan enrevesadas como creemos pueden ser, y que todo ocurrió como nos lo hicieron ver?

Es que si lo analizas fríamente, la versión más enrevesada es la que ofrecen las autoridades. En el fondo, lo que propongo es mucho más sencillo si bien mucho más terrible. Pero es que esa versión oficial no se sostiene de ningún modo. Se desmorona tras el análisis y la investigación.

Un último apunte, Sr. Cardeñosa. Véndame su obra. ¿Por qué la gente debería comprar el libro "11-S: Historia De Una Infamia"? 

Sin ánimo de ser pretencioso, creo que la lectura del libro aportará al lector una visión más de conjunto de los hechos y le ayudará a ver la realidad con ojos más críticos, de forma más racional y sobre todo, de forma más libre. "11-S: Historia De Una Infamia" invita a que no aceptemos lo que se nos cuenta desde los púlpitos del poder y da a quien lo lee mayor libertad. Libertad de pensamiento ante un mundo en el que las ideas que lo rigen no son decisión nuestra, sino de quienes están en el poder. Y eso no debe ser así.

Francisco J. Vázquez

Noviembre/ 2003

 

 

WHEN REALITY SURPASSES FICTION

 

The truth about the attacks on the Pentagon and the Twin Towers.

Dear professor: I would like to ask you about the attack on the Pentagon and the flight 77 of American Airlines. According to an internet version it wasn’t an airplane, but a missile. I would like to know the truth about this issue.

Adolfo M.

 

ANSWER

Dear Adolfo: Recently, I made a session and I consulted Master Ruanel about this topic. In fact, I was very surprised because I could never imagine what happened really.

In this case, rather than any other one, we can say reality surpasses fiction.

I transcribe you directly the session because it was very exhaustive and it clarifies all the doubts perfectly.

Welcome to the club. A strong hug.

 

SESSION OF March/22/2005

Medium: Jorge Olguín.

Entity that came to talk: Ruanel.

Interlocutor: Are you already incorporated, Master? I expect we haven’t woken you up.

Ruanel: Who has invoked me?

Interlocutor: Master, it has been very funny for me to hear your voice from the beyond imitating the ancient mediums who considered the spirits should talk in that way.

Ruanel: No more jokes. It is important to clarify to readers that spirits (like me) don't sleep. We are aware all the time. We are always awake. Somehow, we can meditate in order to look for some solution or some answer to some doubt we have about somebody who needs to be audited.

Interlocutor: In the spiritual plane, don’t you miss to sleep at all?

Ruanel: We don’t go to sleep because we don't have an organic body.

Interlocutor: Of course. Can we talk now about the Pentagon attack?

Ruanel: All right.

Interlocutor: How was this so controversial issue? I say controversial because there were no remains parts of the airplane that supposedly crashed into the Pentagon. Besides, the airplane that was going to collide with this military complex disappeared from radars and it never appeared again. On the other hand, some people believe it was a missile. Was there any missile?  

Ruanel: Yes, there was a missile, but we better begin from the start. The story is this: there was an airplane weighting 60 tons and it had 20.000 liters of fuel. We are speaking of a full-potential airplane which was going to hit the Pentagon commanded by an Arabic who had not the slightest idea about flying a Boeing.

Interlocutor: What happened to that airplane?

Ruanel: There was some kind of dirty trick. There is a planetary system whose inhabitants don't have a long lifespan.

Interlocutor: Are they humans or humanoids?

Ruanel: Their inhabitants are also humans, because they have the same DNA compared to Earth people, but they don't have the technology that terrestrials have here although they can move from one world to another in spaceships and they travel in time. They even have dimensional portals.

When I talk about dimensional portals, I am not referring to the openings like those of science fiction movies, but to worm holes or worms like those made by the aliens from Orion 3 to pass to other worlds.

This is what they had achieved with their technology, but they needed an investigator who could be able to correct their DNA chain because their race was dying.

Interlocutor: What planet are you talking about?

Ruanel: I talk about a planet called Bellatrix IV. It has a blue sun or rather a bluish light. But I continue telling you the story because it is very important to understand what happened to the Pentagon.

There are races in the universe that make progress in a subject, such as space trips, but they don't develop other subjects, such as genetic code.

This race from Bellatrix IV has made enormous advances in many topics, which didn't prevent its planet to get divided into two factions: the North Hemisphere and the South Hemisphere. Both sides had been declared some kind of war.

Interlocutor: Now I see war happens everywhere.

Ruanel: That’s right. The rebels from the South Hemisphere launched missiles to the inhabitants from the North Hemisphere (the peaceful people) to destroy their cities.

These were energy missiles and didn’t leave almost any traces when exploding. It was a missile that directly destroyed places, but without leaving any remains because the matter itself of the missile disappeared when impacting.

These beings could travel through dimensional portals, if you want to call them that way, to other worlds, and they visualized Planet Earth by using those portals in a given moment.

While there were portals in the Pyramids so that aliens from Orion 3 could travel through them to their own planet, these beings from Bellatrix IV were able to visualize what happened on September 11th, 2001, in the United States, by using some devices similar to terrestrial televisions.

So they saw there was an airplane that was going to hit the Pentagon.

Interlocutor: The airplane flown by that insane suicidal rookie?

Ruanel: Correct. Among the passengers of that airplane there were doctors, an ambassador and also two expert scientists in molecular biology, those who correct DNA chains and similar things.

Bellatrix IV aliens took so much interest in these two scientists.

Interlocutor: And they could receive the images with their devices?

Ruanel: Yes, but they also traveled through time one day before September 11th and studied the whole event.

Interlocutor: Do you want to tell me that they were aware of everything because they had traveled through time and investigated it?

Ruanel: Just like that. And they also knew that a terrorist attack was going to happen.

Interlocutor: Wow, how interesting! And why didn’t they avoid it?

Ruanel: They didn't avoid it because they didn’t care about that, since their purpose was another. Mostly, beings from other worlds do not get involve in terrestrial conflicts, neither political nor territorial.

Interlocutor: What did they do then?

Ruanel: Now I tell you what will be the most controversial part for readers. They made what you may call on Planet Earth “double play". When the Boeing was within a few kilometers from the Pentagon, they put a dimensional portal in front of the airplane, so they abducted all passengers to Bellatrix IV.

Interlocutor: That’s why it had disappeared from the radars!

Ruanel: Sure, it was the first play, but the second one was this: Immediately, in milliseconds, Bellatrix IV beings from North Hemisphere replaced the Boeing with the missile shot by the aliens from South Hemisphere against them. They could replace it because, besides their technology to control the portal, they could control time.

Interlocutor: Incredible! Now more than ever we can say that “reality surpasses fiction."

Ruanel: And that missile which was going to hit the city from North Hemisphere impacts the Pentagon.

Interlocutor: As we say here in the physical plane, “this is pure madness”.

Ruanel: I am sure you will think how cruel the beings from the North Hemisphere of Bellatrix IV are. However, they are not cruel, but rather they are merciful, honest and peaceful. The cruel ones are those from the South Hemisphere.

Interlocutor: I can’t understand very well. If they are "good people", why they let that missile hit the Pentagon and kill people?

Ruanel: Well, if a lawyer were going to defend beings from North Hemisphere, he would say: "After all the destruction caused by the missile was the same destruction that the airplane would have caused. On the other hand, they saved all the passengers from death".

Interlocutor: How did they do it?

Ruanel: They have a very advanced technology and they simply managed electromagnetic forces.

Interlocutor: Then, were all the passengers taken to Bellatrix IV?

Ruanel: That’s right. Even the crazy Iraqi pilot was changed his mind. They modified some of his neurons and now he is more peaceful.

Interlocutor: Did they brainwash him?

Ruanel: Do you mean like Nazi techniques?

Interlocutor: Yes, something like that.

Ruanel: No, not at all. They have only modified something from his decoder, so he catch better the concepts from sent by his Thetan. Now, despite of being a spirit or error from plane 3, he is less belligerent.

Interlocutor: Are the passengers comfortable in Bellatrix IV?

Ruanel: They suffered no emotional shock because they knew that the airplane was hijacked by terrorists, it was going to crash and they were going to die inevitably. Moreover, one of the Iraqis was pointing to the crew and the passengers with a machine gun.

Interlocutor: How could that machine gun pass the inspection and get into the airplane?

Ruanel: The obvious explanation is that there were many faults in the security system of the airport. As a consequence of the "everything is because of something", now airports are set in "Orange Alert" and today it is practically impossible to enter with weapons to the airplanes.

Interlocutor: Sure.

Ruanel: Returning to the incident, two video cameras were able to film the missile which was replaced by the beings from Bellatrix IV.

Interlocutor: What was the missile speed?

Ruanel: It reached almost 1440 miles per hour at one point.

Interlocutor: Did the video cameras film the replacement?

Ruanel: We can say yes, because there was a camera filming the airplane that was going to the Pentagon.

Interlocutor: And then it was seen how the airplane disappeared and the missile appeared suddenly?

Ruanel: The missile was not seen, but just something like a figure that flew at tremendous speed close to the floor, at almost 60 centimeters from it.

Notice that the missile crossed a freeway at 1440 miles per hour. However, it didn't damage any car. If it had been an airplane, the shock wave itself  of the airplane had overturned all the vehicles in his path.

Interlocutor: But a missile should not have caused the same effect?

Ruanel: No, because this missile was not made of the same material than terrestrial missiles, since it was an energetic projectile.

Interlocutor: Now I understand.

Ruanel: An airplane, if you want, sweeps the air in the same way as a fan does. On the other hand, that energetic missile didn't move the air due to its energetic nature. Then the air practically didn't make any resistance.

Interlocutor: Now I understand why there were any traces, something that intrigues enormously to the investigators.

Ruanel: Pentagon have five very big walls of concrete that a terrestrial missile could not penetrate and even less an airplane. But however, this energetic missile did it.

Besides, it is obvious that an airplane of the characteristics of a Boeing could not penetrate in such a small hole in which only the cockpit would enter. It means that the rest of the airplane, wings, fuselage, etc., would have been visible and there are pictures that reveal that none of this happened.

Interlocutor: That is what intrigued everyone. The pictures reveal clearly that there was no airplane crashed against the Pentagon. And where did the energetic missile end up?

Ruanel: In the center of the Pentagon, after penetrating the five walls.

Interlocutor: And what did the witnesses who worked inside the Pentagon see? I mean to the energetic missile.

Ruanel: They didn’t see anything. They only saw a force that destroyed everything and they heard tremendous explosions.

Interlocutor: And what is the proof they have that it was a missile?

Ruanel: None, because they don't know it. The only proof they have is the destruction, but they don't know with certainty what caused it.

Interlocutor: In the previous session you said that Pentagon officers knew what had happened. In what way did they know?

Ruanel: In the Pentagon they conjecture that it was an extraterrestrial attack.

Interlocutor: Well, somehow they are not wrong.

Ruanel: Sure, because it was an extraterrestrial attack. But it was not an attack in the traditional warlike way.

Interlocutor: This is perfectly clear. Now I have a question related to that Iraqi pilot. Would he have been able to impact the plane on the Pentagon in spite of being an amateur? I ask this because the expert pilots say that a beginner could never have traveled with a Boeing closer to the floor to impact in that place.

Ruanel: That airplane, considering its direction before being absorbed by the dimensional portal, had the tendency to fall on the adjacent grass to the Pentagon.

Interlocutor: It means that if the alien had not abducted that airplane it would have smashed on the grass and it would have appeared the destroyed airplane and countless corpses?

Ruanel: Correct. When the airplane is replaced by the missile, the missile doesn't follow the same direction of the Boeing and because of that it impacted the Pentagon.

Interlocutor: That’s clear.

Ruanel: There are a lot of pictures about it and, as I already told you, two videos.

Interlocutor: Were these videos destroyed?

Ruanel: The military authorities wanted to do it, but when they arrived there, those videos had already been released to the public. In any case the official version is still the same: an airplane commanded by an Iraqi impacted the Pentagon that day.

Interlocutor:  Which is a nonsense.

Ruanel: Of course. They say that the enormous friction disintegrated the airplane, where are the bodies then?

Interlocutor: In any case nobody believes the official version.

Ruanel: It would be absurd if somebody believes it.

Interlocutor: It seems that it’s perfectly clarified. Now I want to move on to the Twin Towers' attack.

Ruanel: There is still something important to clarify related to the North Hemisphere of Bellatrix IV. Those two expert scientists in molecular biology, who were in the Boeing were grateful to the beings who saved them from a certain death, have been cooperating with them since the date of the abduction in order to prolong their race. Both planets have the same time measure.

And the Southern region, which was a big enemy of the Northern region, believed they had discovered the technology to neutralize their energetic missiles. So they surrendered.

Interlocutor: Did the South ever know that the North deviated the trajectory of the missile to another planet?

Ruanel: No, they didn't know it. They thought they had neutralized it with a gravitational field. This circumstance impelled them to the peace and now the scientists from the South are cooperating with those from the North in DNA experiments.

Now move on to the Twin Towers attack.

Interlocutor: Well. The main issue here is: How could Bin Laden and some inexpert pilots able to carry out the necessary logistics to demolish with so much precision two towers of so enormous size in 9 seconds?. The first question, logically, was there an extraterrestrial intervention here?

Ruanel: No, there was not any extraterrestrial intervention.

Interlocutor: Then how was it? Because I saw the destruction of the buildings due to explosions and in that case the experts took several months preparing them. They put the explosives charges in several parts of the buildings carefully located to make them collapse.

Ruanel: Let us begin from the start. The pilot who was going to impact the Pentagon was an amateur, but the other two pilots commanding the airplanes that impacted the Twin Towers were very expert and they knew very well what they were doing.

Interlocutor: I find here another of the many mistakes made by the investigators, because they said the pilots were not experts. Well, now I ask how the Towers could collapse due to the impact of the airplanes. Were there saboteurs that put dynamite inside the buildings?

Ruanel: No, there was no such thing. Besides, dynamite couldn’t destroy the Towers as they were destroyed. The fact was different.

Unlike towers are made of concrete in other countries, the Twin Towers were practically made of metal because of its 400 mts. high and its structure would have tolerated any impact. They were stronger than the towers made of concrete.

The weakest point was in the same steel, because if those Towers had been made of concrete, the airplanes would have broken the structure, but it wouldn’t have melted it.

The fuel that exploded produced an enormous heat that practically melted the steel.

Interlocutor: But how could the buildings collapse in 9 seconds as the investigators said? Practically in free fall? The experts say that it’s something impossible with a single explosion of fuel.

Ruanel: That is false, because the buildings didn't fall in 9 seconds. If we talk about 9, we could say it was 9 minutes, but not 9 seconds.

Interlocutor: Well, here I see another mistake of the investigators.

Ruanel: The towers collapsed in the time the steel took for melting.

Interlocutor: And the dust in which the towers were turned into? Because as it was said no pieces of the buildings were found.

Ruanel: That is also false. In the towers destruction there is no strange thing, no trap, and no enigma. There was dust that spread over twenty blocks, but definitely there was debris.

The remains of the airplanes have been found, there were burned bodies, pieces of objects, etc. There was no mystery. The only abnormal thing, if one wants to call it this way, it is that the disaster was witnessed by extraterrestrial ships.

Interlocutor: Yes, that has already been clarified some time ago in another session. Where were the ships coming from?

Ruanel: From several origins, from Espiga, from Bellatrix IV. Exactly, the ship that was filmed belongs to Bellatrix IV.

Interlocutor: And it was filmed very clearly.

Ruanel: That’s right.

Interlocutor: Was it entirely a terrorist attack or was there connivance with the American government? The concrete question I make in the first place is if the American government higher authorities knew about the attack that would take place, in the same way that happened to Pearl Harbor?

Ruanel: Yes, both cases are similar. They knew that those events were going to happen, but they didn't prevent them due to negligence.

Interlocutor: Negligence or connivance?

Ruanel: No, not connivance. Negligence.

Interlocutor: Then, in both of the two cases they let those events happen in order to take advantage of the juncture? For example, in the case of Pearl Harbor, so that the United States could have the excuse to enter in the war and, in the case of Bush's government, to attack Iraq.

Ruanel: No, that is a mistake. In both cases there was negligence. In the case of Pearl Harbor, if you review the history a little, you will realize that the United States practically didn't have in that time any warlike capacity.

After the attack to Pearl Harbor they had to work in the factories 24 hours a day to be prepared, with weapons, airplanes, etc. Even if the day had had more hours they would have worked them also.

Interlocutor: Is it an entire infamy then to suspect that Roosevelt let the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor as an excuse to enter in war?

Ruanel: Completely. On the contrary, he had so much incapacity before the attack due to the lack of armament that he gave an order to work intensely for all the factories to get ready and give a lesson to the Japanese.

He even ordered to all the steel factories that were making other things to stop making that things and begin to build weapons.

For example, the auto parts factories, cars, etc., supported the factories of airplanes and armaments for many months.

Interlocutor: But didn't the United States press to Japan so that they attacked them like some historians say?

Ruanel: No, not at all. It was a total act of betrayal on behalf of the Japanese.

Interlocutor: Concretely, the United States didn’t want to enter in war and they didn't have any choice than doing it after Pearl Harbor?

Ruanel: That’s right. And luckily for the Freedom of the World in that time, because it was the United States the country that turned the war around, otherwise the war would have be won by Germany, Japan and Italy.

Interlocutor: I understand.

Ruanel: Returning to the 2001, the attack to the twin Towers was the result of a total act of negligence on behalf of the government because many people had warned to the responsible authorities that an attack was planned against an important objective, but not military, in the heart of New York.

Interlocutor: It’s clear enough. Then all the people who wrote books outlining the hypothesis of an inside job have been influenced by the Spirits of Error? I ask this because, considering what you are telling me now, they have faked the facts. Even I believed those false facts.

Ruanel: Of course the Spirits of Error are behind! We can be able to criticize the United States government whether it is bad or good in the way in which it is leading the country, but never reproach to their own Nation with an excuse to make an invasion.

Interlocutor: Then, can I say with capital letters that such perversion didn't exist?

Ruanel: Yes, you can put it with capital letters. NO.

Interlocutor: Do I have to presume then that all those who have written about a hypothesis of an inside job are mere slanderers?

Ruanel: I would say that they are trader because speaking of an inside job helps the sell books.

Interlocutor: Can we say that Bush administration took advantage of the Twin Towers attack for their own purposes?

Ruanel: Yes, but not that they showed the red color to the bull so that it charged at them and having the excuse to kill him saying: "he attacked me first." This is totally discarded.

Interlocutor: Ok, I believe this point is clear now. Returning to the Twin Towers attack, was there some “Luck” factor?

Ruanel: Keep in mind that at the distance the Towers were small, but when they were closer they were enormous buildings.

Interlocutor: Were they military pilots?

Ruanel: No, they were civilians, but with a lot of flight knowledge.

Interlocutor: Were they merely suicidal?

Ruanel: Yes, totally. Besides they chose them well. They had very good record. Their behavior was commendable. In that time the airports had less security, so they showed their aviator identification card under perfect conditions, with a irreproachable sheet of services, with the best backgrounds.

Interlocutor: It means that the attack was prepared during many months and nothing was improvised?

Ruanel: Yes, of course. They even had other pilots in reserve with the same skills in the case that of the main pilots got sick or had some crisis or any other impediment to fly.

Interlocutor: I keep thinking the Twin Towers attack was something astonishing since it was perfect for the terrorists. Do you ratify me that there was not any explosive inside the buildings?

Ruanel: No, because what exploded and produced the Towers to fall was the fuel of the airplanes. Don't forget that we are speaking about 20.000 liters of very flammable fuel in the tanks of each airplane.

Interlocutor: I read in some article that in order for the steel to be melted, it is necessary more temperature than the produced by the explosion of the fuel.

Ruanel: No, it is not like that. The increase of temperature produced by the explosion of fuel was enough to melt the steel. Besides, the same heat reacted rising at considerable levels. The structure collapsed because each floor impacted on the other below and there was not any support that could stop the collapse.

Interlocutor: Was an implosion or something similar to an implosion?

Ruanel: No, it was not an implosion itself, but they directly fell apart on themselves. What implosion makes is remove the air and the collapse goes inwardly, but in this case it was like a "pancake", it means that each floor that collapsed impacted on the others below.

Interlocutor: Do you say that nothing was coincidence in this case?

Ruanel: No, it was not coincidence because everything was calculated.

Interlocutor: But the effect produced by the impacts was better than the terrorist expected?

Ruanel: Yes, because they didn't expect the Towers to collapse in the way that happened.

Interlocutor: Another thing I have to ask you is about the investigators. It is intriguing that any journalist can interview Bin Laden but the Intelligence services of United States cannot locate him.

Ruanel: That is false, because not anyone can interview him. Only those people who are trustworthy can meet him and before they must go through many controls.

Interlocutor: Nothing to do, like they say, that if the United States finds him the game is over?

Ruanel: No, because if they find him the game is not over, since others will appear and the thing will continue. In fact, Bin Laden is not a person but a character, if we understand the difference. If he disappears, immediately another of similar charisma will appear.

Interlocutor: Will they be preparing another attack?

Ruanel: As long as fundamentalism exists, there will always be attacks.

Interlocutor: Why did so few people die? I believe that it was said that less than three thousand people died. It was calculated that at least twenty thousand people should have been working at the moment of the attack. Is not that strange?

Ruanel: No, not at all. The attack to the towers was carried out very early, and the group of workers accessing to the place were supposed to enter almost a half hour or one hour later.

Interlocutor: Is this all the mystery?

Ruanel: That’s right.

Interlocutor: Then, definitely, all those who are speculating about an inside job are falsifying the facts?

Ruanel: What they are doing is selling books.

Interlocutor: I understand the irony. Would it be something else to add about this topic?

Ruanel: Only related to the fact that the beings of Bellatrix IV have taken the airplane. With this act they have saved lives that otherwise would have died when impacting on the floor. I say impacting on the floor because in the way the airplane was going, it would have crashed on the adjacent grass of the Pentagon. It wouldn’t have touched the Pentagon.

Interlocutor: Do the passengers of the airplane who are now in Bellatrix IV miss their families?

Ruanel: Yes, of course, and many of them are going to what here in the Earth we call psychologists. Some of them have even proposed to abduct their relatives so that they be together again, but the beings of Bellatrix have refused saying that they are dead to them and they should be considered this way. They have been told that they should think that they are living a borrowed life.

Interlocutor: Have these people adapted to that planet?

Ruanel: Yes, they have adapted themselves perfectly. They even have freedom to work in whatever they want or study music, literature and other arts.

Interlocutor: Has some Thetans of the Twin Towers' workers warned somehow to their 10% incarnated bodies so that they wouldn’t go to work that day?

Ruanel: No, not in this case.

 

SESIÓN DEL 21/3/05

Médium : Jorge Olguín.

Entidad que se presentó a dialogar : Ruanel.

 

Interlocutor: Sabemos que a Benjamín Solari Parravicini se lo considera un profeta y también sabemos que cuando lo consultamos con ustedes la respuesta es que las profecías no existen porque nadie puede saber el futuro, salvo el Absoluto y los viajeros del tiempo, que como pauta no lo dirán, salvo las infidencias que puedan cometer estos últimos.

Aclarado esto, mi pregunta es: ¿cómo es posible que esta persona haya podido anticipar de alguna manera el ataque a las Torres Gemelas, porque en un dibujo que hizo sobre la Estatua de la Libertad se ve a ésta partida en dos con una leyenda de su puño y letra que dice: "La libertad de Norteamérica perderá su luz, su antorcha no alumbrará como ayer y el monumento será atacado dos veces".

Mi pregunta, quizás un poco necia, es volverle a preguntar para ratificarlo, ¿no hubo para nada ninguna infidencia de algún viajero del tiempo, sea de la parte encarnada de este viajero o de su Thetán?

Ruanel: Podemos pensar que la referencia es a las Torres Gemelas y a infinidad de cosas más, como a dos ataques directamente a la estatua.

Interlocutor: Que pueden suceder o no.

Ruanel: Exacto, que pueden suceder o no. El hecho de que el ataque haya sido a las Torres gemelas y dejar en "Alerta Naranja" permanente a los aeropuertos, seguramente impide otros ataques que tal vez podrían dirigirse a la Estatua de la Libertad.

Interlocutor: ¿Usted me está queriendo decir que en el dibujo de Parravicini y en su leyenda cada uno puede interpretar lo que quiera a su antojo?

Ruanel: Correcto.

Interlocutor: ¿Y en este caso interpretar que el dibujo y leyenda de Parravicini se refiere a las Torres Gemelas es totalmente antojadizo?

Ruanel: Así es.

Interlocutor: ¿Así de simple?

Ruanel: Así de simple. ¿Por qué quieres ver complicaciones donde no las hay?

Interlocutor: ¿Pero acaso tuvo alguna intuición o fueron los espíritus del Error que se lo dictaron?

Ruanel: Ni lo uno ni lo otro, fue directamente su mente reactiva. Hay muchos supuestos profetas que han hablado generalidades como que "se descubrirá el secreto de las Pirámides", ¡y con esto hay tanta tela para hilar!.

Interlocutor: Es decir que cuando alguien "profetiza" con generalidades esta profecía terminando siendo como el famoso Test de Roscharch, donde cada uno ve lo que quiere ver.

Ruanel: Exacto.

Interlocutor: ¿Concretamente, entonces, ni de casualidad, se relaciona lo que dijo Parravicini con los viajeros del tiempo?, la única forma, por otra parte, de anticipar el futuro.

Ruanel: Tú lo has dicho: ni de casualidad. Tienes que comprender que algo como lo que ha dibujado y ha dicho esta persona es algo muy distinto a contactarse por ejemplo con un águila -estoy hablando metafóricamente- y que el águila diga "veo una pequeña inundación, que se va a acercar y en menos de diez o doce horas va a estar aquí", y que la hormiga que está a ras del suelo diga que "eso es una tontería".

Esto es creíble, y ya pasó cuando Ketter, el Anciano de los Días, predijo años atrás que en el centro de la galaxia había un agujero negro. No fue ningún predestinador ni ningún adivino. Simplemente lo dijo por tener la técnica y estar contactado con seres que estaban cerca de ese centro de la galaxia. Esto no es adivinación y es válido.

Obviamente, si hubiera un viajero del tiempo que se lo está "soplando" a tu Thetán y tú lo dices, también es válido. Pero en el caso de esta persona no fue ninguna de las dos cosas.

Puede haber cosas que se dicen y son intuitivas. De pronto uno puede decir que caerá tal gobierno en tal país o cosas parecidas, pero esto entra dentro de la lógica de la especulación y nada más.

Interlocutor: ¿Por qué puede habérsele ocurrido a Parravicini algo así?

Ruanel: Simplemente porque su mente reactiva estaba en contra de la supuesta libertad, que para él era opresiva, de Estados Unidos. Y la referencia a que la Estatua de la Libertad va a ser golpeada dos veces no fue más que una expresión de deseos manifestada de esa manera. No hay más que esto.

Interlocutor: ¿Usted puede percibir en qué estaba pensando Parravicini cuando hizo el dibujo y escribió la leyenda?

Ruanel: Sí, por supuesto: su mente reactiva, como dije, estaba en contra de la supuesta libertad de Estados Unidos, como diciendo que oprimía a otros países mediante una supuesta democracia y entonces su mente reactiva lo hizo "predecir" irracionalmente de esa manera. Fue nada más que una expresión de deseos destructiva manifestada de la forma en que lo hizo.

Interlocutor: Es decir, en concreto, que las interpretaciones que se hacen en la actualidad de ese dibujo de Parravicini y su texto nada tienen que ver con lo que sucedió con las Torres Gemelas.

Ruanel: Correcto. Es algo parecido a que tú tengas un coche pequeño y veas a una persona con un coche importado y entonces tú digas: "Predigo que esta persona chocará contra un muro de cemento y se hará puré". Y lo único que estás haciendo es manifestar una fuerte expresión de deseos de que tal cosa suceda. Si luego ese automóvil choca, eso no significa que tú hayas predicho nada.

Interlocutor: ¿Todo esto quiere decir que si Parravicini hubiera dicho que el monumento será atacado tres veces estarían esperando un tercer ataque?

Ruanel: Si hubiera dicho tres veces también sería válido porque incluirían el ataque al Pentágono. Y también sería válido si hubiera dicho que será atacado una sola vez, porque fue en un solo día.

Interlocutor: ¿Está Jorge como para seguir y tocar directamente el tema del ataque a las Torres Gemelas y al Pentágono?

Ruanel: No, lo tendremos que dejar para la próxima sesión.

Interlocutor: Bien, pero por lo menos quisiera saber si hay algo raro en todo esto. Lo pregunto porque estuve estudiando el tema y los datos que hay no concuerdan para nada.

Ruanel: Hubo intervención extraterrestre.

Interlocutor: ¡No me diga! ¡Con razón las piezas no encajaban! ¿Ellos lo saben?

Ruanel: ¡Pero por supuesto que lo saben! ¿Cómo no lo van a saber?

Interlocutor: ¿Por eso lo ocultan?

Ruanel: ¡Claro que sí! Ellos no han encontrado nada, ningún resto del avión que presuntamente se iba a estrellar en el Pentágono.

Interlocutor: ¿Usted me está diciendo que Bin Laden no tuvo nada que ver?

Ruanel: No, lo que estoy diciendo es que los extraterrestres aprovecharon la oportunidad.

Interlocutor: Ahora entiendo. Bueno, no quiero profundizar más porque prefiero dejarlo para la próxima sesión donde profundizaremos en el tema. ¿Le parece bien?

Ruanel: De acuerdo.

Interlocutor: ¿Algo más que quiera agregar?

Ruanel: No, solamente que estoy muy entusiasmado de volverme a contactar contigo por intermedio de este receptáculo.

Interlocutor: Antes de concluir la sesión quiero comentarle algo que me ha ocurrido en esta sesión que en ninguna otra me sucedió, y es que Jorge desapareció completamente y en la habitación estábamos solamente usted y yo. Me extraña porque en las otras sesiones siempre éramos tres, pero en esta no. Es una rara sensación de una fuerte presencia suya aquí.

Ruanel: Es por mi mismo entusiasmo. Hay un aprecio personal. Uno dice que en el plano 5º no hay aprecio personal. Sí que lo hay. Nosotros sabemos que tenemos más afinidad con unos espíritus que con otros, pero como los espíritus de los planos IVº y 5º no tenemos ego, no nos ofendemos si de repente yo tengo más afinidad con unos espíritus que con otros.

Yo contigo, tengo una afinidad, del uno al diez, de diez. Tal vez con otra entidad tengo una afinidad ocho, y si esa entidad es una entidad de Luz no se va a ofender por ello, porque la ofensa es ego.

Los dejo con toda mi Luz.

Interlocutor: Hasta luego, Maestro, y gracias.

Los científicos que viajaban en el avión abducido.

Estimado profesor: Respecto a lo del avión del pentágono resulta que estuve revisando la lista oficial de pasajeros del vuelo 77 de AA y efectivamente hay dos personas que trabajaban en el área de investigación genética, pero no son hombres sino mujeres: Dora Menchaca de 45 años y Lisa Raines de 42.

La lista oficial está aquí: http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html

Adicionalmente, otro punto es que los secuestradores no eran Iraquíes sino de Arabia Saudita.

Finalmente, me gustaría que también le diera crédito a Xavier (el muchacho de Barcelona) con quien suelo intercambiar mensajes y hablando sobre este tema fue que dimos con las dos señoras genetistas.

Dar Ta-el.

 

 

RESPUESTA

Apreciado Dar Ta-el: Te agradezco los datos pues no los conocía. Coincidentemente hace unos día un consultante me comentó que no había ningún científico en el avión desaparecido y no supe qué responderle.

Desde ya que hago extensivo el agradecimiento a Xavier.

Un fuerte abrazo.